top of page

VIREC

(US Department of Veteran's Affairs Information Resource Center)

A University of Michigan School of Information Design Clinic project to test and evaluate a new platform to ensure the business requirements were fulfilled while researching new features that could be incorporated into the platform for future iterations. 

August 2020 - December 2020

tl;dr

Got a lot going on? Here's a quick breakdown:

Project typeUMSI Design Clinic, User Research, Prototype evaluation

Goal: The goal of this project was to evaluate a new prototype of a next-generation knowledge sharing platform, uncover pain points and recommend any changes and features for future versions. 

Skills & tools Analyzing user requirements, generating user tasks and consolidating test flows, conducting interviews, shadowing users​

My role: On Team of 4, I was a focus group facilitator + researcher 

image_edited.jpg

Note: An NDA associated with this project so details were not permitted to be shared

02

Overview

The client was the US Department of Veteran's Affairs Information Resource Center: VIReC

Based on previously established business requirements, the team at  VIReC wanted us to evaluate how their existing prototype fulfilled their requirements based on user feedback.

03

Timeline

  • We devised a plan to create task flows based on requirements, shadow users actually using the prototype, and conduct interviews to get comprehensive feedback from the users.

  • We then analyzed our information by creating an affinity wall and presented our findings on what worked well, what needed improvement, and what new features should be looked into going forward.

Screen Shot 2020-12-20 at 12_edited.jpg
115905-200.png

POINT

PIVOT 

The Issue:

Due to security issues and firewalls our team was unable to get access to the prototype to get a clear understanding

How it was Handled

We relied on screen shares, recorded videos, and product walkthroughs to understand the product

04

Task Lists

  • We first consolidated tasks lists and devised action task items

  • Task lists were based on previously established personas based on the types of user activity on the prototype

9 consecutive tasks

2 types of tasks 

Tasks derived from most common actions completed by personas

115905-200.png

POINT

PIVOT 

The Issue:

The requirement list and project files given to us were outdated 

How it was Handled

We carefully screened the requirements and prioritized them based on business requirements provided by the client. The task list was generated from the most important requirements. 

05

Shadowing

  • Interview consisted of an individual 30 minute shadowing session and a 30 minute combined interview session

  • Interviewers acted as silent observers as participants went through the flows

  • Interviewees were separated into breakout rooms, performed task flows, & answered post-completion questions

image_edited.jpg

One on one sessions, with one interviewer and one participant in each breakout room

  • Separated into breakout rooms

  • Provided task flows through a form

  • Answered post-completion questions 

  • Interviewers acted as silent observers

115905-200.png

POINT

PIVOT 

The Issue:

Due to COVID, all four team members were suddenly working from different time zones all over the world

How it was Handled:

We moved the majority of our work to be asynchronous and  had checkpoints to ensure the work was being done. Sleep was also sacrificed along the way. 

06

Interviews

  • The interviewers and interviewees gathered for a 30 minute joint interview session 

  • Received feedback on usability of both general task flows as well as specific tasks

13 participants

Data Analyst

Statisticians

Researchers

image.png
image.png
image.png

07

Affinity wall

  • From our interviews we extracted important quotations and clustered them according to similar concepts and ideas

  • We organized them into a hierarchy of broader concepts and issues that we uncovered through our interview findings

Screen Shot 2020-12-20 at 6.09.04 PM.png

Organized interview notes

Highlighted key findings

Group Analysis

08

Key findings

  • ​Key features included searching, tagging, voting, notification, and aesthetics 

  • There were mixed views on many features depending on previous experience and preferences

image.png

Search

Extremely useful features that could benefit from extended and more advanced functionality

image.png

Voting

Mixed views on the voting system. Labels such as "best answer" or "verified answer" could help maintain quality

image.png

Aesthetics

The platform is an improvement over the existing platform but should be more content focused with less white space

image.png

Tagging

It would be helpful if the tagging feature could come with instructions for those unfamiliar with the feature

image.png

Notifications

Extremely useful feature that users will need but needs added personalization to customize notifications

09

Lessons learned

Gained experience conducting client interviews and shadowing users navigating tasks 

Learned how to conduct user research within the limitations of a virtual environment 

Gained confidence in learning about user research methodologies and conducting usability testing 

City architecture and skyscrapers near waterfront_edited.jpg

CHECK OUT SOME OF MY OTHER PROJECTS:

bottom of page